A simple, easy-to-understand explanation of the experiment that proved the particle nature of light and won Einstein a nobel prize. The Photoelectric Effect.
Hi! I'm Jade. I make fun physics videos that will make you smarter while making you smile :)
***Let's be friends***
***RELATED VIDEOS YOU WILL LOVE***
The Double Slit Experiment: Light as a Wave https://youtu.be/gRX-s0p4HpM
How Many Dimensions Can You See? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwWbSVzAFLQ
Thanks for watching!
The Photoelectric effect proved the quantum nature of light and won Einstein a nobel prize. It proved that light is made of particles! This discovery was controversial at the time as Thomas Young proved that light was a wave in 1801 with his Double Slit Experiment.
The experiment that proved the quantum nature of light (light is a particle) went like this: A negatively charged metal plate which is called the "emitter" is placed opposite a positively charged metal plate called the collector. They are both placed in a vacuum chamber and connected by a wire and battery. The electrons in the emitter want to jump across to the collector plate, but the vacuum is preventing movement within the chamber. A light source is introduced to give the electrons the energy they need to jump the gap to the collector. The energy from the light is transferred to the electrons in the form of kinetic energy. This flow of electrons produces a current which is measured by an ammeter in the circuit.
If light were a wave, the amount of electrons being freed from the emitter plate should depend on the intensity of the light, not the frequency. Light of higher intensity means a wave of bigger amplitude which means a wave carrying more energy. So a higher intensity should produce a larger current. So if the intensity of the light is high enough, regardless of the frequency of the light, the electrons should be given enough energy to break free. Also, this energy transfer should be gradual as there is a build up of energy,, so there would be a time delay between when the light hit the electrons and when they are emitted. Furthermore, the kinetic energy of the electrons should increase as intensity increases. This means they travel with more speed toward the collector.
Turns out none of that happened. The electrons jumped off the emitter instantaneously, there was no gradual build up of energy. It was as if the electrons were getting knocked off the surface. But the most interesting observation was that the kinetic energy of the electrons was dependent on the frequency of the light, not the intensity. For some frequencies, no electrons jumped off the metal at all. The only way to explain this behaviour is that light is a particle (photon). The threshold frequency (sometimes called stopping po...
This site provides links to random videos hosted at YouTube, with the emphasis on random.
The original idea for this site actually stemmed from another idea to provide a way of benchmarking the popularity of a video against the general population of YouTube videos. There are probably sites that do this by now, but there wasn’t when we started out. Anyway, in order to figure out how popular any one video is, you need a pretty large sample of videos to rank it against. The challenge is that the sample needs to be very random in order to properly rank a video and YouTube doesn’t appear to provide a way to obtain large numbers of random video IDs.
Even if you search on YouTube for a random string, the set of results that will be returned will still be based on popularity, so if you’re using this approach to build up your sample, you’re already in trouble. It turns out there is a multitude of ways in which the YouTube search function makes it very difficult to retrieve truly random results.
So how can we provide truly random links to YouTube videos? It turns out that the YouTube programming interface (API) provides additional functions that allow the discovery of videos which, with the right approach, are much more random. Using a number of tricks, combined some subtle manipulation of the space-time fabric, we have managed to create a process that yields something very close to 100% random links to YouTube videos.
YouTube is an American video-sharing website headquartered in San Bruno, California. YouTube allows users to upload, view, rate, share, add to playlists, report, comment on videos, and subscribe to other users. It offers a wide variety of user-generated and corporate media videos. Available content includes video clips, TV show clips, music videos, short and documentary films, audio recordings, movie trailers, live streams, and other content such as video blogging, short original videos, and educational videos. Most content on YouTube is uploaded by individuals, but media corporations including CBS, the BBC, Vevo, and Hulu offer some of their material via YouTube as part of the YouTube partnership program. Unregistered users can only watch videos on the site, while registered users are permitted to upload an unlimited number of videos and add comments to videos. Videos deemed potentially inappropriate are available only to registered users affirming themselves to be at least 18 years old.
YouTube and selected creators earn advertising revenue from Google AdSense, a program which targets ads according to site content and audience. The vast majority of its videos are free to view, but there are exceptions, including subscription-based premium channels, film rentals, as well as YouTube Music and YouTube Premium, subscription services respectively offering premium and ad-free music streaming, and ad-free access to all content, including exclusive content commissioned from notable personalities. As of February 2017, there were more than 400 hours of content uploaded to YouTube each minute, and one billion hours of content being watched on YouTube every day. As of August 2018, the website is ranked as the second-most popular site in the world, according to Alexa Internet, just behind Google. As of May 2019, more than 500 hours of video content are uploaded to YouTube every minute.
YouTube has faced criticism over aspects of its operations, including its handling of copyrighted content contained within uploaded videos, its recommendation algorithms perpetuating videos that promote conspiracy theories and falsehoods, hosting videos ostensibly targeting children but containing violent and/or sexually suggestive content involving popular characters, videos of minors attracting pedophilic activities in their comment sections, and fluctuating policies on the types of content that is eligible to be monetized with advertising.